{"id":2842,"date":"2019-04-08T12:40:14","date_gmt":"2019-04-08T10:40:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/?p=2842"},"modified":"2019-04-08T12:40:40","modified_gmt":"2019-04-08T10:40:40","slug":"when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/","title":{"rendered":"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Be it in public or private debates, the online defamation or assassination of character and the violation of rights relating to personality, exposed to the wider public, have become commonplace these days. That is why it is worth knowing our legal options, should we be subjected to such grievances.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h2>\n

In its decision no. 303\/2019. (II. 13.)<\/a>, the Constitutional Court expressed its opinion on a criminal case concerning the online debate between two public figures, known for their rather outspoken and blunt style, P\u00e9ter Hajd\u00fa and R\u00f3bert Puzs\u00e9r. The case was triggered by a Facebook post, in which Mr. Puzs\u00e9r used the phrase \u201cpile of shit\u201d to describe Mr. Hajd\u00fa. After a court hearing Puzs\u00e9r was found guilty of character assassination. The court stated that although Puzs\u00e9r had the right to express his criticism of the personality and actions of Hajd\u00fa as a public figure, the phrase \u201cpile of shit\u201d had nothing to do with discussing public affairs. The criticism completely disregarded Hajd\u00fa\u2019s human dignity, therefore it was deemed defamatory. This verdict was only the starting point of a legal dispute, which was then taken to the Constitutional Court.<\/p>\n

The subject of the Constitutional Court\u2019s decision, analysed in this blog entry, is the character assassination committed during the abovementioned criminal case and allegedly repeated by Puzs\u00e9r\u2019s posting of his video commentary of the trial. To be more exact, Puzs\u00e9r repeated the contested phrases, including the words \u201cpile of shit\u201d at court and posted the video of the speech for the defence online, where he discussed at length why in his opinion the phrase objected to is allowed by freedom of speech.<\/p>\n

Hajd\u00fa responded by filing another criminal case under private prosecution against Puzs\u00e9r for the latter\u2019s words used during the first criminal case and in the footage posted online, which Hajd\u00fa took as defamatory. The case was dismissed by the final ruling of the Metropolitan Court of Budapest.<\/p>\n

The reason for this was that according to the Metropolitan Court, Puzs\u00e9r did not say those words just for the sake of saying them; instead he expressed his opinion and put forward his defence on the phrases that had been made the subject of the case, so his act was not unlawful. Puzs\u00e9r, as a public figure, talked about an ongoing court case, during which he shared the contents of the speech for his defence, therefore he stayed within the boundaries of the freedom of expression.<\/p>\n

The constitutional complaint<\/h2>\n

Mr. Hajd\u00fa turned to the Constitutional Court. According to the constitutional complaint<\/a>, by dismissing the case, the court had violated the right to human dignity (Article II, Fundamental Law) and the right to have a person\u2019s good reputation respected (Paragraph (1), Article VI, Fundamental Law). Furthermore, the dismissal also violated another section of the Fundamental Law, according to which the right to freedom of expression may not be exercised with the aim of violating the human dignity of others (Paragraph (4), Article IX, Fundamental Law). The court\u2019s decision to extend Mr. Puzs\u00e9r\u2019s right to defence representation constitutes the above violations, since it is against the Fundamental Law.<\/p>\n

The decision of the Constitutional Court<\/h2>\n

Naturally, it cannot be disputed that by dismissing the case, the court gave preference to exercising the right to freedom of expression over the right to human dignity and the right to have a person\u2019s good reputation respected. Therefore Hajd\u00fa\u2019s rights have been restricted in order to allow Puzs\u00e9r to exercise his right to freedom of expression. The Constitutional Court had to weigh up the necessity and proportionality if this restriction.<\/p>\n

In terms of the right to human dignity, Constitutional Court decision no. 7\/2014. (III.7.)<\/a> has already shown that the only instance when the right to human dignity may not be restricted is when it is considered the legal determinant of the human status, while restrictions may be applied to partial rights, derived from it, such as the right to have a person\u2019s good reputation respected.<\/p>\n

In our case the fact that it was a debate between two public figures is of crucial importance. Since this debate was closely followed by the media and was given great publicity, it can be considered a public debate. The relevance of the above lies in the fact that pursuant to Paragraph (1), Article IX of the Fundamental Law, a party taking part in a public debate as a public figure is obliged to tolerate any criticism of him or her. Obviously, there is a clear-cut Constitutional Court practice in this regard, according to which there is an essential and protected part of human dignity, which must be respected by any critic at all times during such debates (Constitutional Court decision no. 3122\/2014. (IV. 24.)<\/a>). This protected domain of human dignity is violated if it is specifically targeted by the expression of an opinion, in other words, when the critic denies or doubts the human nature of the affected party. According to this principle, in the first court case identifying someone as a \u201cpile of shit\u201d constitutes a defamatory action.<\/p>\n

In the second case, however, the Constitutional Court decided to dismiss the constitutional complaint in spite of the fact that Mr. Puzs\u00e9r used the descriptive term \u201cpile of shit\u201d as an epithet repeatedly. What is the difference between the two situations, when the parties and the derogatory phrase are the same?<\/p>\n

Compared to the first case, in which Puzs\u00e9r was found guilty of defamation of character, the second case differs in terms of the aim of the communication. Based on the circumstances of the second case, the Constitutional Court found that the aim of the communication was to report on a public debate, therefore this communication was not an end in itself. In the court\u2019s opinion, although Puzs\u00e9r\u2019s report (posting the video of the court hearing and adding his comments) undoubtedly involved \u201crecalling\u201d the defamatory remarks, from a constitutional point of view its aim was to apply the freedom of expression, which is protected by law. In other words, its aim was to explain Puzs\u00e9r\u2019s position on whether the technical term of \u201cpile of shit\u201d could be used in a public debate and also to share his opinion on the outcome of the case. In this context, the aim of using the phrase \u2018\u201dpile of shit\u201d was not an end in itself to attack Hajd\u00fa as a human being, but instead to discuss a case in which the public had shown great interest. Hajd\u00fa\u2019s right to human dignity and to have his good reputation respected was only restricted to a necessary degree and in necessary proportion by not providing legal protection in the criminal case.<\/p>\n

Summary<\/h2>\n

Based on the Constitutional Court decision, concluding the legal debate, we can state that the use of defamatory terms in violation of the right to human dignity does not always constitute character assassination or the violation of the right to have a person\u2019s good reputation respected. When people take part in public debates as public figures, pursuant to Paragraph (1), Article IX of the Fundamental Law they are obliged to tolerate critical and even degrading (and obscene) remarks against them, if such remarks, as part of a public debate, are not considered an end in themselves. However, when expressing our opinion about public figures, we must refrain from using defamatory remarks, which have nothing to do with the public debate and question a person\u2019s human dignity and status, just for the sake of using them.<\/p>\n

The case can be also interpreted as Mr. Hajd\u00fa now having an official document on what he looks like. At the same time, the classic statement of the Constitutional Court never rang more true: you degrade yourself by using degrading words. We can only hope that the Constitutional Court\u2019s practice of giving a green light to graphic expressions in public debates, which we described above and deem correct, will not encourage public figures to further degrade the standard of public speech by using even harsher language.<\/p>\n

Keeping these arguments in mind, whenever we are faced with the disproportionate restriction of the freedom of expression in similar cases, it is worth turning to the Constitutional Court <\/a> \u2013 as we can see, these complaints may be brought to a successful conclusion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Be it in public or private debates, the online defamation or assassination of character and the violation of rights relating to personality, exposed to the wider public, have become commonplace these days. That is why it is worth knowing our legal options, should we be subjected to such grievances. Background In its decision no. 303\/2019. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2826,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2842","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-constitutional-law","8":"entry"},"yoast_head":"\nWhen the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit | Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit | Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Be it in public or private debates, the online defamation or assassination of character and the violation of rights relating to personality, exposed to the wider public, have become commonplace these days. That is why it is worth knowing our legal options, should we be subjected to such grievances. Background In its decision no. 303\/2019. […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-04-08T10:40:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-08T10:40:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"385\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/01a4ee4e56fd87ecae15742c92c2e6af\"},\"headline\":\"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-08T10:40:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-08T10:40:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1397,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/szarkupac.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Constitutional Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/\",\"name\":\"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit | Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/szarkupac.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-04-08T10:40:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-08T10:40:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/szarkupac.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/szarkupac.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":385,\"caption\":\"Szarkupac\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/\",\"name\":\"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda\",\"description\":\"Jogi k\u00e9pvislet az Alkotm\u00e1nyb\u00edr\u00f3s\u00e1g \u00e9s az Emberi Jogok Eur\u00f3pai B\u00edr\u00f3s\u00e1ga el\u0151tt\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00dcgyv\u00e9di Iroda\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/karsai-daniel-logo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/karsai-daniel-logo-1.png\",\"width\":600,\"height\":160,\"caption\":\"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00dcgyv\u00e9di Iroda\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/01a4ee4e56fd87ecae15742c92c2e6af\",\"name\":\"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0ec0df4035b4177f5a4711eaf9097b93fd9ca23413b719213055cfc0650a31aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0ec0df4035b4177f5a4711eaf9097b93fd9ca23413b719213055cfc0650a31aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0ec0df4035b4177f5a4711eaf9097b93fd9ca23413b719213055cfc0650a31aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/drkarsai.hu\\\/en\\\/author\\\/eszter\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit | Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit | Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda","og_description":"Be it in public or private debates, the online defamation or assassination of character and the violation of rights relating to personality, exposed to the wider public, have become commonplace these days. That is why it is worth knowing our legal options, should we be subjected to such grievances. Background In its decision no. 303\/2019. […]","og_url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/","og_site_name":"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda","article_published_time":"2019-04-08T10:40:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-08T10:40:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":385,"url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/"},"author":{"name":"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#\/schema\/person\/01a4ee4e56fd87ecae15742c92c2e6af"},"headline":"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit","datePublished":"2019-04-08T10:40:14+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-08T10:40:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/"},"wordCount":1397,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","articleSection":["Constitutional Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/","url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/","name":"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit | Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","datePublished":"2019-04-08T10:40:14+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-08T10:40:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","width":1200,"height":385,"caption":"Szarkupac"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/when-the-constitutional-court-takes-no-bullshit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When the Constitutional Court takes no bullshit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#website","url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/","name":"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00fcgyv\u00e9di iroda","description":"Jogi k\u00e9pvislet az Alkotm\u00e1nyb\u00edr\u00f3s\u00e1g \u00e9s az Emberi Jogok Eur\u00f3pai B\u00edr\u00f3s\u00e1ga el\u0151tt","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#organization","name":"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00dcgyv\u00e9di Iroda","url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/karsai-daniel-logo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/karsai-daniel-logo-1.png","width":600,"height":160,"caption":"Karsai D\u00e1niel \u00dcgyv\u00e9di Iroda"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/#\/schema\/person\/01a4ee4e56fd87ecae15742c92c2e6af","name":"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ec0df4035b4177f5a4711eaf9097b93fd9ca23413b719213055cfc0650a31aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ec0df4035b4177f5a4711eaf9097b93fd9ca23413b719213055cfc0650a31aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0ec0df4035b4177f5a4711eaf9097b93fd9ca23413b719213055cfc0650a31aa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter"},"url":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/author\/eszter\/"}]}},"featured_image_src":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","featured_image_src_square":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/szarkupac.jpg","author_info":{"display_name":"Mih\u00e1ly Eszter","author_link":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/author\/eszter\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2842"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2842\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2843,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2842\/revisions\/2843"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drkarsai.hu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}